Loma Linda University Medical Center v. Neese (In Re Neese)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Various creditors of the bankruptcy estate appeal a ruling denying an extension of time to file a complaint to determine dischargeability. They and the trustee had agreed to an extension, but did not reduce their stipulation to writing. Appellants did not file their motion for extension of time until after the expiration of the 60-day period prescribed by B.R. 4007(c). 1
FACTS
Ronald Neese, appellee/debtor, while employed by appellant Loma Linda University Medical Center (LLUMC), accused LLUMC and Compucare, Inc., a data processing firm, also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Moses Hill, Debtor. Phelix Jones, Creditors v. Moses Hill, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- DeLesk v. Rhodes (In Re Rhodes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Buckeye Gas Products Co. v. Rhodes (In Re Rhodes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re MoralezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Schunck v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Brown v. Barley (In Re Barley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- In Re StoeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff)District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.