Dey v. Dey
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On plaintiff’s rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the eoiirt was delivered by
Pabkeb, J.
The suit is by a wife for the alienation of her husband’s affections and for inducing him to “desert plaintiff and leave her without his affection, support, protection and consort.'v Since the act of 1906 (Pamph. L., p. 525) such an action has been maintainable in this state. Sims v. Sims, 79 N. J. L. 577. The jury found a verdict for defendant, and the propriety of this verdict is challenged both as against the weight of evidence, as against all the evidence, and for certain alleged errors of law occurring at the trial.
We fail to find that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hadley v. HeywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Neville v. GileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Du Peirat v. WolfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Hallinger v. ZimmermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNelis v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Amellin v. LeoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- C.M. v. J.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Grobart v. GrobartNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- McKinnon v. ChenowethOregon Supreme Court · 1945