Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberto Raul Carreno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2004No. 02-10464PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of Roberto Carre-no’s conviction and seventy-month sentence for criminal violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (alien transportation), 18 U.S.C. § 1203 (hostage taking), and 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Carreno raises a number of evi-dentiary and other claimed errors related to his jury trial. None of these rises to the level of reversible error. In sentencing Carreno to a seventy-month term, the district court imposed a sentence enhancement for creation of substantial risk of death or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Leigh Christina Miguel, United States of America v. Norman Jeremiah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Gerardo Bueno-VargasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MessanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Carreno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Nguyen v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API