Legal Opinion

Nguyen v. Runnels

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2005No. 04-15179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner Son Nguyen appeals from the denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo the denial of a habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, see Gill v. Ayers, 342 F.3d 911, 917 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

1. Nguyen’s due process and fair trial rights were not violated by the admission of gang evidence at his state court trial. To obtain federal habeas relief based upon state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Talal B. Jammal v. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California Superior Court of the County of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (HC) Townsend v. NevschmidDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API