Legal Opinion
Dorman v. Satti
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1988No. Civ. H-86-898(AHN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEYAS, District Judge.
This case requires the court to consider the constitutionality of Connecticut’s newly-enacted Hunter Harassment Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. Section 53a-183a, which penalizes those who interfere with or harass persons engaged in the “lawful taking of wildlife.” The plaintiff was arrested under the Act after she had approached several hunters taking waterfowl in state marshlands near her home and verbally attempted to dissuade them from their hunt. Although the charge against her was subsequently dismissed, she brought this action pursuant to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Francelle Dorman v. C. Robert Satti and Lester J. ForstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- State v. LilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Kamasinski v. Judicial Review CouncilDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- United States v. ScanioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.