Legal Opinion
State v. Bagley
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 13, 1991No. 90-2446, 90-2447, 90-2448PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
The state appeals an order dismissing the interference with fishing citations against the defendants in violation of sec. 29.223(2)(a)3, Stats. The trial court dismissed the citations upon concluding that this statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Because the statute is not vague or overbroad, we reverse the order of dismissal.
The defendants, James Bagley, Daniel Olejniczak and Tommy Thompson, each received a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) citation for violations of sec. 29.223(2)(a)3, Stats. The state alleges that on April 25, 1990, the defendants intentionally prevented…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. ZwickerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GivensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Madison v. BaumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Kenosha v. C & S MANAGEMENT, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Joseph Brown v. Jeffrey KempCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Binkowski v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- State v. JanssenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. MinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.