Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Howarth Et Ux. v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1949No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Drew,

This action in assumpsit was brought by John A. Howarth and Jennifer Howarth, trading as Howarth and Company, to recover from George H. Gilman, Martin Gilman and Alexander Brown, trading as Gil-man Manufacturing Company, the sum of $1,733.13, allegedly due under two oral contracts in accordance with which Howarth and Company prepared plans and drawings for a clothes hamper and rendered engineering advice concerning the manufacture and production of wardrobe cabinets. Gilman Manufacturing Company, defendants, denied the execution of these contracts but a jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Miller v. Belmont Packing & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Greevy v. ReifsteckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. HumphreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sablosky v. MessnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. HELLER v. DEPUYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Reich v. ReadingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API