Legal Opinion

Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1995No. 97462, (Calendar No. 4)Published

1Opinion of the Court

449 Mich. 155 (1995)

534 N.W.2d 502

HENISER

v.

FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Docket No. 97462, (Calendar No. 4).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 11, 1995.

Decided July 6, 1995.

Cholette, Perkins & Buchanan (by Bruce M. Bieneman and Robert A. Kamp) for the plaintiff.

Morrison, Mahoney & Miller (by Phillip K. Yeager and Meigs M. Day) for the defendant.

BOYLE, J.

The question presented is whether the homeowner's insurance policy in this case provides coverage for the destruction of the insured's building. We hold that the policy is unambiguous, that the destruction of the building does not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API