Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brighton Pharmacy, Inc. v. Colorado State Pharmacy Board

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 2007No. 05CA2358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Appellants, Brighton Pharmacy, Inc. (the pharmacy), and Donald Coble, Pharm.D., CDE (the pharmacist), seek review of the rulemaking action of the Colorado State Pharmacy Board (the Board) following which it promulgated Rule 3.00.21, 3 Code Colo. Regs. 719-1 (the Rule). We affirm.

On July 21, 2005, the Board held a rule-making hearing to consider a rule prohibiting pharmacists from dispensing prescription drugs resulting from Internet-based questionnaires, Internet-based consultation, or a telephonic consultation without a valid preexisting patient-practitioner…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for BroadcastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Golob v. ARIZONA MEDICAL BD. OF STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Netflix, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Turney v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Turney v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API