Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alvarado Hospital, LLC v. Cochran

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 22, 2017No. 2016-1356Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the ruling that the Medicare Act’s jurisdictional assignment to the district courts does not apply when there is an offer of settlement of a Medicare reimbursement claim. This explicit statutory assignment is not erased if the Medicare administrator offers to settle a Medicare claim. The jurisdictional statute is clear, and precedent has long implemented its terms:

Any individual, after any final decision of the [Secretary of HHS] made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API