Legal Opinion

People v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As the People correctly concede, the plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not advised, prior to entering his plea of guilty, that his determinate term of imprisonment would be followed by a mandatory period of postrelease supervision. Therefore, the judgment of conviction must be reversed and the defendant’s plea of guilty must be vacated (see People v Cornell, 16 NY3d 801, 802 [2011]; People v Hill, 9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007], cert denied 553 US 1048 [2008]; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 544-545 [2007]; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]; People v Peck, 78 AD3d 1199, 1200 [2010]; People…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. WrottenNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BanksNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
  2. People v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. BanksNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
  4. People v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court, Queens County · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API