People v. Cornell
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
A trial court has the constitutional duty to advise a defendant of the direct consequences of a guilty plea, including any period of postrelease supervision (PRS) that will be imposed as part of the sentence (see People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 244-245 [2005]). “Although the court is not required to engage in any particular litany when allocuting the defendant, ‘due process requires that the record must be clear that the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by50 opinions
- People v. WeichowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BolivarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FuertesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.