Legal Opinion
People v. Wrotten
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 2009No. 199PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
In People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]), we upheld the use of two-way televised testimony of a vulnerable child witness and concluded that no violation of either the Federal or State Constitution existed. On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether Supreme Court erred in permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court. We conclude that Supreme Court did not err, as the court’s inherent powers and Judiciary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Vincent Gigante, Also Known as "Chin,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- People v. Ricardo B.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Horn v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. SmartNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Robert F.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- Wrotten v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.