Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sloan v. Kubitsky

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 2, 1998No. AC 16471Published

1DissentLavery, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, which affirms the trial court’s decision to preclude the defendant Edward J. Winter from asserting recoupment as a defense. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly found that Atlease, and not Winter, would be the proper party to assert a recoupment defense and that mutuality of obligation was a prerequisite for Winter to assert the recoupment defense in this case. I would conclude that Winter was a proper party to assert, and should have been allowed to assert, the defense of recoupment in this case for the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. HefnerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Springer v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Himrod v. BaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API