Legal Opinion

Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1978No. 3539PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, Justices. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This matter comes before the court on a petition for review from the superior court’s order denying a motion to substitute Carl Pederson and Bernard Parks 1 as individual counterclaimants following our remand in Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. State, 564 P.2d 30 (Alaska 1977).

The facts leading to the present dispute are summarized in our opinion in Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. State, supra. Prior to dissolution of Arctic Contractors, John Parks and Pederson were principal stockholders…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Victor Schaffer v. Universal Rundle Corporation, Universal Rundle Corporation v. Victor SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Martin v. MaldonadoAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sparling v. Hoffman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Schroeder v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. In Re BonhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1998
  4. Bruno v. Southeastern Services, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Nicholson v. AshColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API