Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Cover

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1926No. 11,556PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE complaint of plaintiffs in error was dismissed without prejudice on motion of defendants after demurrer to replication was sustained. Plaintiffs bring error.

The following are the facts essential to our decision: Estella Conroy and S. A. Cover, brother and sister, brought this action against U. G. Cover, their brother, to compel him to account for funds delivered to him in trust by their father and mother for the benefit of their six children, i. e., the said parties and Grace Pierce, T. W. Cover and P. O. Cover. He was charged with misappropriation of the funds by conversion to his own…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Pierce v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. McLean v. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Searles v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  2. Morton v. Pacific Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Micheletti v. MoidelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Melville v. WeybrewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Stratton v. Beaver Farmers' Canal & Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API