Legal Opinion

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 20, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*449Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing in part and affirming in part.

Adjoining the northern limits of the city of Middlesboro, the plant or factory of the Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Company is located. Bordering the northern limits of its tract of land, which is quite a large one, is a public road, and immediately across it plaintiffs own land upon which they reside and on which also are some five or six tenant houses that they rent to tenants who work at the plant of the above mentioned company, to which we shall hereafter refer as the Coke Company,

Somewhere about the year 1893, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. McPherson v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Kent v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Walker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Dant v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. MillsKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kelly v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  4. Williamson v. Stafford, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Buttorff v. United Electronic Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API