Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming’ in part and reversing in part.

In a proceeding begun by appellants, under the declaratory judgment act, it was adjudged in the court below that it was not unlawful for cattle or any species thereof^ to run at large in Walnut Grove voting precinct No. 19, in Fulton county, Kentucky.

On August 31, 1917, a petition for a stock law election being then pending in the Fulton county court, the fiscal court of that county made an order in which it directed that the election should apply to the county as *816a whole, and at an election held on November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Axton v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Cochran v. HamblenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Jefferson County Ex Rel. Coleman v. ChiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Veith v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API