Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1988No. 4-87-00046-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In a bench trial, appellant was convicted of felony theft by check and given a two year probated sentence.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for instructed verdict based on insufficient evidence. After* moving for an instructed verdict, however, appellant put on a defense, thereby waiving any error. Kuykendall v. State, 609 S.W.2d 791, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Since appellant’s argument discloses that his real complaint is one of insufficient evidence, we shall review the sufficiency of the evidence. TEX.R.APP.P. 74(d); Seals v. State, 634 S.W.2d 899,…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Seals v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  4. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Guadian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Christensen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Goff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API