Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1948No. 24048PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of an automobile over the value of Fifty Dollars. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to establish his guilt of the offense of theft; that if he is guilty of anything, it is swinding. The solution to this question rests in the evidence.

The record shows that on the 15th day of May, 1947, M. W. Price was engaged in buying and selling automobiles. On that day, appellant came to Mr. Prices’s place of business and purchased a 1941 model…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deblanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Roe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cameron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Redding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API