Legal Opinion
LAM
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1972No. 2157PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2157 MATTER OF LAM In Deportation Proceedings A-17563885 Decided by Board July 5, 1972 (1) A special inquiry officer does not cease to be impartial in a deportation proceeding merely because in his quest for the truth he seeks to clarify the record by calling the attention of the trial attorney to certain areas of inquiry not yet developed. [Cf. Matter of Martinez Solis, Interim Decision No. 2135.] - (2) Since 8 CFR 242.17(d) provides that an application for voluntary departure made during the deportation hearing "shall not be held to constitute a concession of alienage or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Yam Sang Kwai v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Ah Chiu Pang v. Immigation and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Kimm v. RosenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Renate Luise Marlowe v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Galyna Semienovna Halaim and Mariya Semienovna Halaim v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fatos Vasha v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Bi Qing Zheng v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- SANDOVALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1979
- Jose Galvan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.