Legal Opinion

Yam Sang Kwai v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 17, 1969No. 21784PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge.

At about 6:00 p. m. on the evening of October 12, 1967, petitioner’s place of business was surrounded by officers of the respondent with the purpose of interrogating any aliens therein. Certain officers were stationed at both the entrance and the exit. None knew of the petitioner’s existence nor of the identity of any of the patrons before entering. One officer, Officer Podrasky, entered the restaurant and confronted the petitioner with certain questions concerning petitioner’s right to be in the United States. Because of a language difficulty petitioner (being able to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Handlovits v. AdcockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
  5. Nieto v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Stone v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Virginia Zepeda v. United States Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Blackie's House of Beef, Inc. v. Leonel J. Castillo, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Nos. 79-1057Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Illinois Migrant Council v. PilliodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API