Tiemann v. Citizens' Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J. :
The plaintiffs were, prior to the 29th of October, 1898, the owners of two lots of land upon which there were two dwelling houses. known as Nos. 245 and 247 West One Hundred and Twenty-fourth street. On that day the' defendant issued and delivered to the plaintiffs a policy of insurance whereby it insured the plaintiffs for a term of one year against all direct loss or damage by fire to the said premises to the amount of $6,000. That policy seems to have been in the usual form, and by its terms was to be void “ if any change, other than by the death of an insured, take place in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haight v. . Continental Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Green v. . Homestead Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Walradt v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey, a Corporation v. Foxbilt, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Windey v. North Star Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Beman v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Rosenbloom v. Maryland InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Tauriello v. Aetna Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.