Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Maryland Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance. The plaintiff’s complaint is in the usual form and contains all of the allegations necessary to the maintenance of such an action. The policy insured plaintiff’s warehouse against direct loss or damage by fire in an amount not to exceed $2,000, for the term of three years from August 4,1936, to August 4,1939. On September 30, 1938, the property Was damaged and partly destroyed by fire, resulting in an alleged loss of $1,480.28, for which amount plaintiff demands judgment.

The defendant’s answer, after denying only those allegations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savarese v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. of LeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Foley v. Manufacturers & Builders' Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Browning v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Tiemann v. Citizens' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey, a Corporation v. Foxbilt, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  2. First National Bank v. Boston InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. SR International Business Insurance v. World Trade Center Properties, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. Tauriello v. Aetna Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API