Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2009No. ED 92778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, P.J.

Introduction

George W. Morgan (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion to Reopen his post-conviction proceedings (Motion to Reopen). We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In September 1992, after a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of one count of forcible rape and two counts of forcible sodomy. Appellant was sentenced to 3 consecutive 15-year terms of imprisonment. In December 1992, Appellant appealed the conviction and sentence. On April 28, 1993, Appellant filed a pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Edgington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Burgin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hutchinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Donny Lee Cox v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Kevin Lucious v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Michael M. Pennell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Ballard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API