Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2013No. ED 99259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Introduction

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.

James Ballard (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s questions during Mov-ant’s cross-examination. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Movant was charged as a prior and persistent offender with one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, two counts of endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree, one count of statutory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donny Lee Cox v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. RONALD R. SPRADLING, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. State of Missouri v. Frederick J. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API