Legal Opinion

Michael M. Pennell v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 2015No. ED101708PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

Michael M. Pennell (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.15 1 for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant challenges the motion court’s denial, asserting he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly challenge the trial court’s jurisdiction. We affirm.

Background

A jury convicted Movant of one count of the class B felony of distribution, delivery, or sale of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo. (Cum.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DAVID C. MASON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Hendricks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Chatman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. LUCAS L. CAMPBELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API