Michael M. Pennell v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge
Introduction
Michael M. Pennell (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.15 1 for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant challenges the motion court’s denial, asserting he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly challenge the trial court’s jurisdiction. We affirm.
Background
A jury convicted Movant of one count of the class B felony of distribution, delivery, or sale of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo. (Cum.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DAVID C. MASON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hendricks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Chatman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- LUCAS L. CAMPBELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016