Legal Opinion

Farrow v. Farrow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1951No. 9957PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

This is a divorce suit in which divorce is no longer an issue.

The complaints made by the appellant, Mrs. Valeria D. Farrow, who obtained the divorce in a non jury trial, are (1) that the court erred in not holding that all of the property involved was community property on the ground that the separate and community estates of the parties had been so commingled as to destroy identification; (2) that the court erred in ordering alimony allowed her pending appeal payable out of her share of the community estate; and (3) that the court erred in not allowing a fee for her attorneys.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Andrews v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Mooers v. Richardson Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Crenshaw v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Bradley v. Ingalls (In Re Bradley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. W.L. Lindemann Operating Co. v. StrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Horlock v. HorlockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API