Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 1, 1935No. Nos. 549 and 550PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
In these cases certiorari was granted to review a decree of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 73 F. (2d) 577, which affirmed a decree of the district court overruling motions to dismiss the bills of complaint and to vacate the appointments of receivers. The questions involved are of public importance. See Pennsylvania v. Williams, 294 U. S. 176; Gordon v. Ominsky, 294 U. S. 186; Penn General Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania, 294 U. S. 189.
On February 14, 1933, petitioner, the Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, took possession of the business and property of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.