State v. Castro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The defendant was convicted of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c.1 *422He appeals, claiming that the trial court erred (1) in restricting his cross-examination of a witness in violation of his constitutional right to confrontation, and (2) in failing to instruct the jury on lesser included homicides pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-45 (c).2
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The incident which led to the defendant’s arrest took place on October 19,1978. The defendant left his home at approximately 10:30 a.m., drove to a package store, and purchased a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.