Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 4, 1988No. 22854PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

The family court issued an order purporting to attach and sequester appellant Lloyd’s (Husband’s) state retirement account for respondent Lloyd’s (Wife’s) support. Both Hus- and and the South Carolina Retirement System (State) appeal. We reverse.

Husband and Wife divorced in 1984. The divorce decree approved an agreement whereby Husband agreed to pay Wife support and that Wife would remain the beneficiary of Husband’s state retirement account unless she remarried. Husband agreed that he would not withdraw the funds without Wife’s consent and that he would do nothing to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Prewitt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Public School Employees' Retirement Board v. Wexford Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Langley v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API