H & W Contracting, LLC v. City of Watertown
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] The City of Watertown (City) advertised for bids on a project to replace a portion of its storm sewer. The lowest bidder was Pipestone Concrete, Inc. (Pipe-stone). H & W Contracting, LLC (H & W) was the next lowest bidder. After the contract was awarded to Pipestone, H & W sued City claiming it should have been awarded the contract because of irregularities in Pipestone’s bid. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of City. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE,[¶2.] On March 23, 2000, City issued an invitation for bids on a project involving the replacement of a major lift…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Metropolitan Air Research Testing Authority, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Trap Rock Industries, Inc. v. KohlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Labrado v. County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Doe v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Gray v. GienappSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.