Legal Opinion

United States v. McClain

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 10, 2012No. 12-0099/ARPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Specialist Matthew J. McClain pleaded not guilty at a general court-martial to one specification of possessing child pornography and one specification of distributing child pornography, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006). A military judge found McClain guilty of both specifications and sentenced him to reduction to E-l, confinement for fourteen months, and a bad-eonduet discharge. The convening authority approved thirteen months of the adjudged confinement and otherwise approved the sentence adjudged. The United States Army Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. WinckelmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  4. United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. United States v. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  3. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API