Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 2002No. CC 9612-49561; CA A96947; SC S46609PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
A Multnomah County jury convicted defendant of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, 1 and three counts of recklessly endangering another person, ORS 163.195. 2 Defendant appealed, arguing that the trial court’s decision to admit hearsay statements made by a witness who did not testify at trial violated defendant’s right to “meet the witnesses face to face” under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, 3 and his right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him” under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 4 Reviewing the case en banc the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. CopelandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.