Matusow v. Trans-County Title Agency, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
In this case we analyze the reach of the “domestic relations” exception to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Supreme Court has emphasized the narrowness of this exception, explaining that it “encompasses only cases involving the issuance of a divorce, alimony, or child custody decree.” Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 704, 112 S.Ct. 2206, 119 L.Ed.2d 468 (1992). Because the instant case does not involve the “issuance of a divorce, alimony, or child custody decree,” we hold that the District Court erred by dismissing the case for lack of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Caroline Chevalier v. Kimberly BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Kendall v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Stewart Merritts, Jr. v. Leslie RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- Van Tassel v. Lawrence County Domestic Relations SectionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Mochary v. BergsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.