Legal Opinion

Romero v. Romero

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2002No. E030759Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

Husband Paul Louis Romero appeals from the trial court’s postjudgment order denying his request for modification of spousal support based on a change in his income as a result of his disability. Husband’s sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in considering his new spouse’s income in violation of Family Code section 4323, subdivision (b).

We conclude that, under the current law, the trial court is precluded from any direct or indirect consideration of a subsequent spouse’s or nonmarital partner’s income in determining or modifying spousal support. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Loh v. LohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Fuller v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Gammell v. GammellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API