Fuller v. Fuller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, J.
The primary issue here concerns whether in ruling on a motion to modify child support the trial judge may properly consider, in any way, the combined income and assets of the parent and his or her nonmarital partner. We answer in the affirmative and conclude that in this case there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge.
Appellant (Mr. Fuller) and respondent (Mrs. Fuller) were divorced in 1969. On February 15, 1978, Mr. Fuller sought modification of his child support payments, seeking a reduction of those payments from $60 per month per child to $15 per month per child.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pencovic v. PencovicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Marriage of MilchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Marriage of FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Monterey County v. CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Sommer v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- In Re Marriage of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of TapiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.