Legal Opinion
Tidal Oil Co. v. Forcum
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 13, 1941No. 28390PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action for damages arising from the wrongful death of plaintiff’s husband, alleged to have been caused by a dog bite terminating in hydrophobia. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the trial court, from which the Tidal Oil Company, joint defendant with O. M. Stevens, has perfected this appeal.
The petition alleged that Stevens was the district superintendent in charge of the Tidal Oil Company’s Corbray farm and other leases belonging to the defendant; that all operations on the said lease were under the immediate control of Stevens, as agent and superintendent of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Serio v. American Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Clinkenbeard v. ReinertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Hazlett v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Moore v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. CoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ayers v. MacOughtrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magnum Foods, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Peerson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Romfh v. BermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Arrington Funeral Home v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Gaines Bros. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.