Legal Opinion

Matter of Reinstatement of Katz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1995No. SCBD 3963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

Petitioner Scott William Katz seeks reinstatement into the Oklahoma Bar Association after being disbarred in 1986. We denied reinstatement after a hearing in 1992. He has reapplied. The trial panel recommends that reinstatement again be denied. After a thorough review we agree.

THE RELEVANCY QUESTION

We must first address Petitioner’s argument with respect to the evidence presented at the reinstatement hearing. Throughout the hearing Petitioner repeatedly urged that only his conduct since his last reinstatement petition, which was filed in 1992, was relevant for consideration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Matter of Reinstatement of CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of EliasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Matter of Reinstatement of SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. In Re the Reinstatement of McConnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Reinstatement of FraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. In re Reinstatement of KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of MuminaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. In Re Reinstatement of PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API