Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 25, 2003No. A-8367Published

1DissentMannheimer, Judge

This case raises the issue of whether a defendant's prior DWI conviction from another state qualifies as a "prior conviction" under AS 28.35.030(r)(4) if that other state does not recognize a motorist's right to an independent chemical test of their breath or blood. Simpson has prior DWI convictions from California. California statutory law gives motorists the right to choose a blood test (presumably, an independent chemical test) instead of a breath test: see California Vehicle Code § 23612(a)(2)(A).1 - However, *601the California courts have repeatedly held that this statutory right is not a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. People v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Skinner v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Pananen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API