Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hammer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1927No. 20496. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to prevent the issuance and sale of bonds by diking district No. 23 and to have the organization of the district declared to be void and of no effect. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment dismissing the action, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

By diking district No. 23, it was sought to reclaim approximately ten thousand acres of tide lands of the second class in Skagit county. To this end, on May 21, 1925, the persons owning property therein filed a petition with the board of county commissioners praying for the organization of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State ex rel. American Savings Union v. WhittleseyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Malim v. BenthienWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Brown Bros. v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McClain v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. White v. Kaibab Road Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API