Legal Opinion
Washington v. Sobina
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 12, 2005No. 02-CV-7474PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Petitioner Richard A. Washington (“Washington”) petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to United States Magistrate Judge Diane M. Welsh for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The R & R recommended that I grant the petition in part and deny the petition in part. The parties filed objections. For the reasons set forth below, I will overrule petitioner’s and respondent’s objections, adopt the R & R as supplemented by this Memorandum, 1…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Washington v. SobinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Washington v. SobinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Washington v. SobinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Washington v. SobinaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.