Legal Opinion

Western Kentucky Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Cabinet

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 21, 2001No. 2000-CA-002883-MRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDDLESTON; Judge.

With Chief Justice Marshall’s famous declaration “the power to tax involves the power to destroy,” the United States Su*789preme Court established the doctrine of federal immunity from state taxation, a principle founded on the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.1 By voluntarily waiving immunity from state taxation in certain instances, the Buck Act2 narrowed the application of this general principle while maintaining the protection afforded to instrumentalities of the United States. At the heart of the present controversy is the question of whether a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Revenue Cabinet v. Comcast Cablevision of the SouthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. Brinkley v. HoukDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
  3. Edmonson County v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  4. Dever v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  5. Richardson v. ReesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API