Legal Opinion

Tallent v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 26, 1998No. A-6267PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Paul A. Tallent was convicted of second-degree theft under AS 11.46.130(a)(6)(C). This statute provides that a theft of between $50 and $500 — an offense that would normally be third-degree theft — constitutes second-degree theft if the defendant has been convicted of similar thefts twice before in the preceding five years. Tallent’s appeal raises two issues, both involving the question of whether the jury should have been informed of his prior convictions.

The first issue is whether the existence of a defendant’s prior theft convictions is an element of the offense of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mead v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. Azzarella v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  5. State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  2. Eppenger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  3. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  4. Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API