Legal Opinion

Mead v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1968No. 804PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crimes of burglary, larceny, and possession of a firearm by a person previously convicted of burglary.

Appellant and Robert Maxwell were jointly indicted for the crimes of burglary and larceny. Maxwell moved for and was granted a continuance of his trial. Appellant joined in Maxwell’s motion, but a continuance was not granted as to him. Appellant contends that the granting of a continuance as to Maxwell operated as a matter of law as a granting of a continuance as to appellant, since they were jointly indicted, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tafoya v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Thessen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Klockenbrink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API