Legal Opinion
Jones v. City of Brunswick
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 2010No. Case 1:08-CV-1432PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53), in which they argue that none of the Plaintiffs claims present disputed issues of fact for a jury. Plaintiff Christine Lynn Jones opposes this motion (Doc. 54) and the Defendants have filed a reply to her opposition (Doc. 57). 1 For the following reasons, hav ing fully considered the parties’ briefs and attached exhibits, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
I. BACKGROUND
This lawsuit arises under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
- Afjeh v. Village of Ottawa HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Doe v. City of MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021