Legal Opinion

Stephan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1937No. 33,434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action upon an alleged oral contract of life insurance. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The plaintiff made the necessary allegations as to organization and permission to do business of the defendant insurance company; that it maintained a district office at Pittsburg, Kan., in charge of Terrill G. Honn, and that defendant entrusted Honn and agents working out of the district office with the making and supervision of the terms of applications for health and accident insurance in defendant company, arranging for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banks v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. West v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Yasbec v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smither v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Pratt v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API