Legal Opinion

Yasbec v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1931No. 29,867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*828The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This litigation had its inception in proceedings to obtain compensation for the death of a workman who sustained fatal injuries in a Crawford county coal mine nearly six years ago. Eventually it developed into an action of garnishment to collect on an oral contract of industrial accident insurance to satisfy an award ■of compensation in behalf of the deceased workman’s dependents.

In the year 1925 one Enrico Chiocci and two partners operated a coal mine near Mulberry in Crawford county. The business name of the partnership was the Umbria Coal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Preferred Accident Insurance v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Wilson v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Samson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Townsend v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lattner v. Federal Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Bankers Indemnity Ins. v. PinkertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Alma M. Epperson, Administratix of the Estate of Arthur R. Epperson, Deceased v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. Stephan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API