Legal Opinion

Jose Semane Coloma v. Carlyle I. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 11, 2006No. 05-13728PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Pro se federal prisoner Jose Semane Coloma appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Coloma was sentenced twice in separate federal proceedings on different charges, and he asserts that, because those charges were related, the second court’s intention to have his sentences run “concurrently” should be construed under the Guidelines to require the Bureau of Prisons to subtract time served from the 188 months imposed as his second sentence. Because the second sentence already accounted for any overlap due to separate prosecutions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Juan A. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Anthony Ruggiano, Jr. v. R.M. Reish, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Kaufmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. James F. BidwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Daewoo Motor America, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Michael D. Wright, Sr. v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. BellamyOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Jack Sisemore v. T. C. OutlawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Jonathan O. Madu v. Michael ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API