Gardner v. Cumberland Town Council
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentGoldberg, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I am of the opinion that the majority’s conclusions in this case are incorrect and that the Gardners were deprived of their right to procedural due process. Because the Gardners enjoyed a constitutionally protected property interest in accessing their land through this public roadway, and the statute under which a municipality is authorized to abandon a street or highway requires that specific procedural guarantees be afforded to the abutters before an abandonment decree is issued, this abandonment order ought not stand.
This Court has declared that “[a]n abandonment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'REILLY v. Town of GlocesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- Wolfe v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950
- Barber v. Exeter-West Greenwich School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Golden Gate Corporation v. SullivanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. PendletonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.