Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gardner v. Cumberland Town Council

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 30, 2003No. 2001-290-M.PPublished

1DissentGoldberg, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I am of the opinion that the majority’s conclusions in this case are incorrect and that the Gardners were deprived of their right to procedural due process. Because the Gardners enjoyed a constitutionally protected property interest in accessing their land through this public roadway, and the statute under which a municipality is authorized to abandon a street or highway requires that specific procedural guarantees be afforded to the abutters before an abandonment decree is issued, this abandonment order ought not stand.

This Court has declared that “[a]n abandonment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'REILLY v. Town of GlocesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. Wolfe v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950
  3. Barber v. Exeter-West Greenwich School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Golden Gate Corporation v. SullivanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  5. Frank W. Coy Real Estate Co. v. PendletonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API